It’s been a de-facto approach that all new products have accrued most of the revenue to ALPACA. So saying there will be no benefits is outright incorrect. Even in the case of option 2/3, it clearly states 40% of tokens go to ALPACA.
This proposal was for increased support for the new products we just announced, Perp Exchange and AF2.0, and to create a schedule for 10 years of innovation. You can say we didn’t say there would be a tokenomics change considered. But you should also say we did not say Alpaca would get a Perp Exchange and new product lines from AF2.0, that can generate revenue for token holders. Good decision-making adjusts to the situation at hand.
I’ll reiterate that the Alpaca team is indifferent to the results of this discussion. So if you don’t want to support new products and innovation on the Alpaca platform, that’s your right, but the results of a short-term oriented mindset have already been discussed enough and are self-evident.